US Liberalism
Mike Malloy, who used to present a great talk radio programme on the, now
defunct IE America Radio, has started a blog on his site.
it's worth a read, even if just to convince yourself that Michael Moore is not the only person appalled by antics of 'The Bush Crime Family' as Malloy calls them ;)
Unfortunately there is no sign yet of another outlet for Mr Malloy, but hopefully Air America Radio will take him on at some point. But, given the fuss the FCC are making over swearing etc in the post-Janet's-boob shock and awe, it seems unlikely anyone who isn't totally sanitised will be allowed on the air in the US :(
Friday, April 23, 2004
Speed Camera Myths
First off, I don't have a problem with speed cameras. It's the law, rules are rules etc. I don't even think they should be painted with luminous 'Look I'm a speed camera' paint either. I was never much of a speeder, having a daughter and watching her not look as she crosses the road has made me more aware of the danger of even an extra 5 mph so...
A piece in the excellent (IMHO) Prospect Magazine in April, made the point that many of the financial arguments against speed cameras are complete tosh, vis a vis -
"Urban myths are proliferating around speed cameras. One of the commonest is that they are a backhanded way for local authorities to take pressure off increases in council tax. In fact, the total raised by all cameras last year was just £73m. The surplus after costs was just £6m - and that went to the treasury. Even if councils had got their hands on it, it would have amounted to less than 0.3 per cent of receipts from council tax."
(Unfortunately you can only see the whole ariticle on the web if you are a subscriber. You can get the magazine in Borders in the UK, and if you are not a completely mental right -wing nutter it's worth a look)
There were also some figures showing that most of the money raised by cameras goes back in to maintaining them and adding more so,
unlike parking fines, the Council don't make anything out of them.
First off, I don't have a problem with speed cameras. It's the law, rules are rules etc. I don't even think they should be painted with luminous 'Look I'm a speed camera' paint either. I was never much of a speeder, having a daughter and watching her not look as she crosses the road has made me more aware of the danger of even an extra 5 mph so...
A piece in the excellent (IMHO) Prospect Magazine in April, made the point that many of the financial arguments against speed cameras are complete tosh, vis a vis -
"Urban myths are proliferating around speed cameras. One of the commonest is that they are a backhanded way for local authorities to take pressure off increases in council tax. In fact, the total raised by all cameras last year was just £73m. The surplus after costs was just £6m - and that went to the treasury. Even if councils had got their hands on it, it would have amounted to less than 0.3 per cent of receipts from council tax."
(Unfortunately you can only see the whole ariticle on the web if you are a subscriber. You can get the magazine in Borders in the UK, and if you are not a completely mental right -wing nutter it's worth a look)
There were also some figures showing that most of the money raised by cameras goes back in to maintaining them and adding more so,
unlike parking fines, the Council don't make anything out of them.
ID Cards Revisited
A story about a MORI poll in The Register suggests the public are in favour of ID cards but don't trust the government to implement them properly or to make the IT project side a success. Certainly there is not much past evidence to suggest the IT side will be delivered on time and on budget...
A story about a MORI poll in The Register suggests the public are in favour of ID cards but don't trust the government to implement them properly or to make the IT project side a success. Certainly there is not much past evidence to suggest the IT side will be delivered on time and on budget...
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)